The crystal data for at least one material for each zeolite Framework Type are
available in the database. Wherever possible, data for natural zeolites or as-synthesized materials
(i.e. not calcined) have been included, so that comparison with an experimental pattern of a new
material is easier.
The data on these interactive web pages were first published in the book
Collection of Simulated
XRD Powder Patterns for Zeolites (3rd ed.) by M.M.J. Treacy, J.B. Higgins & R. von Ballmoos. The
original data from the literature were entered into the
ZeoFile program (J. M. Newsam and
M. M. J. Treacy,
Zeolites,
13, 183-186, 1993).
A note of caution should be addressed to the user of these patterns. They are very useful in
helping to establish the structural purity of a zeolite phase, yet they may not always allow one
to readily and unambiguously determine the Framework Type of a sample. This assignment is often
not straightforward and may require more sophisticated analyses. A pertinent review of factors
affecting the diffraction characteristics of zeolite materials has been provided by W. J.
Rohrbaugh and E. W. Wu (
ACS Symposium Series 411, 279-302, 1989).
Material
In many cases, the materials selected for inclusion in the database are natural
zeolites, whose structures were refined with single crystal data. However, for many of the Framework
Types represented, there are no known natural counterparts. In these instances, typical as-synthesized
materials have been selected if a suitable structure refinement could be found.
In cases where this was not possible, the best available refinement of the structure of the
calcined material was used. It should be borne in mind that powder patterns generated from such
data will show significant differences in the peak intensities (particularly at low angles) from
the patterns of the corresponding hydrated or as-synthesized materials.
If no reliable structure refinement could be found, coordinates from a framework geometry optimization
(DLS refinement) were used.
In cases where significant differences are observed in the diffraction patterns of isotypic materials
(i.e. those with the same zeolite Framework Type), several reference materials have been included to
illustrate the extent of the differences observed as a result of variations in composition and/or
symmetry. Outstanding examples are edingtonite and K-F (
EDI), gismondine, amicite, gobbinsite, and
Na-P1 (
GIS) , and as synthesized vs calcined ZSM-5 (
MFI).
Patterns of the commercially
significant X and Y zeolites are also included to complement the natural faujasite (
FAU) data.
Composition
Compositions are expressed in terms of the full unit cell content. Two compositions
are listed: that provided in the original reference and that calculated from the crystal structure data.
Pattern calculation (List hkl and Plot pattern)
The powder diffraction data include the Miller indices (
hkl), 2θ value
(for the selected radiation),
d-spacing and relative intensity for each reflection in the 2θ
range specified. The scattering factors used for the framework T- and O-atoms in the structure factor
computations are those selected by the authors of the original work. If none were specified, atomic
(neutral) scattering factors are used. No adsorption corrections are applied to the data and anisotropic
temperature factors have been converted to isotropic temperature factors B(iso) Å
2.
The powder diffraction patterns are calculated for the radiation and 2θ range set by the user with
the program
FOCUS written by Ralf Grosse-Kunstleve (R.W. Grosse-Kunstleve, L.B. McCusker and Ch.
Baerlocher,
J. Appl. Cryst.
30, 985-995 (1997)). The polarization factor can be changed to
reflect the effect of having a monochromator in the beam or of using highly polarized X-rays (e.g.
synchrotron
radiation).
The intensity scale can be specified in different ways to accomodate extreme situations or to
highlight specific regions of the pattern. The intensity is scaled relative to the
height of the peak/reflection selected. This linear intensity may differ slightly from the integrated
intensity given in the numerical diffraction data.
Profile parameters
The powder diffraction patterns are calculated using a pseudo-Voigt (pV) peak-shape
function
pV = aL + (1-a)G
where L and G are the Lorentzian and Gaussian contributions, respectively, and a is the mixing parameter.
By default, the 2θ step size is set to 0.02 ° (i.e. the pattern intensity is
calculated for every 0.02 ° in 2θ), the background level to 0.0, the Lorentz contribution to 50
(i.e. a = 0.5), the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) to a constant value of 0.07°, and the
2θ range of a reflection to 10 times its FWHM. All of these values can be changed by the user.
The FWHM can be changed by entering the parameters UVW for the function
FWHM = sqrt(U + V tanθ + W tan2θ)
Many real samples will give diffraction patterns with lines broader than 0.07° as
a result of instrumental broadening, disorder, and/or small crystallite size, whereas synchrotron
measurements might exhibit lines as narrow as 0.02°.
For comparison purposes, it may also be
useful to use the
V and
W parameters to simulate the 2θ dependence
of the FWHM.
For patterns with a high Lorentzian contribution, the peak range factor might need to be increased to
avoid truncation of the peak "tails".
Plot parameters
Images of the zeolite powder patterns are generated as 8 x 6 inch pictures with three
different resolutions: 50 dpi, 80 dpi and 110 dpi. The resulting images correspond to the following
screen and file sizes.
Image size |
pixels |
file size |
small(50dpi) |
410 x 310 |
2.6 kB |
medium (80dpi) |
640 x 480 |
4.4 kB |
large (1100dpi) |
880 x 650 |
7.0 kB |
last updated: 13-April-2025